Hamas Warns of a Total Collapse of the Gaza Ceasefire and Related Roadmap

Tehran, IRNA — In a statement carried by IRNA citing Shihab News Agency, Hamas warned that a total collapse of the Gaza ceasefire and the accompanying roadmap could unfold if Israel persists in failing to adhere to the terms of the agreement. The message comes as the Hamas spokesperson emphasized the movement’s full readiness to execute the roadmap agreed upon with the United Nations Special Coordination Committee on Gaza’s peace plan and to take the necessary steps to move the process forward.

Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem underscored that the group has already prepared to implement the agreed roadmap and that all measures necessary to this end have been taken. But he attributed the potential collapse of the ceasefire and the roadmap to what he described as the occupier regime’s refusal to comply with the agreement and the escalation of aggression against Gaza’s population. He also pointed to what he framed as a failure by the Special Coordination Committee and its representative, Nikolai Miladinov, to compel Israel to honor its commitments under the ceasefire and roadmap.

A central part of Qassem’s message was a call to facilitate the entry of a technocratic committee into the Gaza Strip by all sides, notably the United States and the Special Coordination Committee. He argued that this is essential to fulfilling responsibilities toward Gaza’s residents and to initiating a process toward the deployment of international forces in line with the ceasefire and the roadmap that accompanies it.

The IRNA report notes that such assertions come amid broader regional commentary. It cites a contemporaneous piece from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, which, on the eve of Israeli elections, described rising disagreements about Gaza’s future and suggested that Israeli officials were reluctant to cooperate with the Gaza Peace Council. This framing provides background to the tensions surrounding the ceasefire and the roadmap, illustrating how competing narratives and political pressures can influence the perceived viability of any accord.

Taken together, the statements from Hamas, alongside the Haaretz report, underscore the fragile and contested nature of any ceasefire in Gaza and the difficulty of translating a roadmap into enforceable action when key parties show hesitancy or resistance to compliance. The IRNA-authored dispatch emphasizes the risk that without credible guarantees, robust international engagement, and a willingness by all sides to honor commitments, the prospects for sustained peace remain uncertain.

Background details in the report point to a broader debate about international mediation in Gaza. While Hamas asserts readiness to abide by the agreed plan, Israel’s alleged noncompliance and the international mechanisms designed to enforce it are cited as critical levers that could determine whether the ceasefire endures. The mention of an international forces deployment, contingent on adherence to the roadmap, signals the high stakes involved and the extent to which external actors are seen as pivotal to any durable stabilization in the region.

In sum, the IRNA report frames Hamas’s warning as a warning about more than a temporary breach—it suggests a potential, near-term collapse of the ceasefire and its associated roadmap if core obligations are not met. It also frames a path forward that hinges on greater international engagement, the operationalization of a technocratic committee in Gaza, and a renewed push by the parties involved to uphold the terms of the ceasefire and roadmap. The piece also reminds readers of the dynamic and contested information environment surrounding Gaza’s future, where statements from Hamas, Israeli officials, and international media narratives all contribute to the evolving picture of what comes next for peace efforts in the region.